|
7:49 PM (6 hours ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
August 11, 2014
Peter Mackaymcu@justice.gc.ca,The first step to this hunger strike is FMEP after many years of asking how the child support I'm allegedly in arrears for went from the control of FMEP to the pocket of a legal aid lawyer. Michael ThorNton, Chilliwack BC.
The second step is the failure of the RCMP to respond to my email request the investigation a private company, FMEP, profiting from government corruption, documents supplied.
The third and final is your failure to address the previous minister of justice on provincial corruption being a provincial matter.
If I find no response to this email I will post daily events on my blog under day 1 tomorrow by 8 pm.
lawlessfmep.blogspot.ca
Hours not Days
Robert Smith
Chilliwack BC
FMEP
JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca,
agwebfeedback@gov.bc.ca
Peter Mackaymcu@justice.gc.ca,The first step to this hunger strike is FMEP after many years of asking how the child support I'm allegedly in arrears for went from the control of FMEP to the pocket of a legal aid lawyer. Michael ThorNton, Chilliwack BC.
The second step is the failure of the RCMP to respond to my email request the investigation a private company, FMEP, profiting from government corruption, documents supplied.
The third and final is your failure to address the previous minister of justice on provincial corruption being a provincial matter.
If I find no response to this email I will post daily events on my blog under day 1 tomorrow by 8 pm.
lawlessfmep.blogspot.ca
Hours not Days
Robert Smith
Chilliwack BC
FMEP
JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca,
agwebfeedback@gov.bc.ca
The way it is.
ReplyDeleteCurrently the petition is stalled with most men's groups, fathers rights or shared parenting groups I've followed don't support child support, with many fearing it will cause more incentive to raise children on child support.
I have no argument to counter the fear but I am a little surprised it wasn't picked up by women's groups that are in favor of government doing instead of saying child support is for the children.
Preliminary indications of fear of retaliation by government could be the main factor. I have no argument to the fear of government, the reverse in fact.
Collecting child support from our most vulnerable children certainly is. It would seem the government moral depravity to increase revenue has no bounds so one needs to assume the same rules apply to protecting the booty.
The way it will end.
Doubling the child poverty rate in a decade currently doesn't enter into the child poverty equation because the results won't affect the next election. In 2005 based on a 1 in 10 child poverty rate I predicted the generation turning street age in 2015 should be called Gen U because when the government tells them its time to put on the yoke they will day upurs. They are not only starting to show up on the street but are bolstered by a 1 in 7 rate. The 1 in 5 turns street age around 2020 but just based on 1 in 7 I've predicted the cause of record child poverty will make 2017 the year plausible deniability hits a brick wall.