February 3, 2016
The RCMP have had 2 decades to uphold the law. The tens of billions investors have lost in Canadian equities is on their heads. The premise I've been working on is the tens of billions will demand the RCMP be disbanded, along with tort to recover losses caused by the dereliction of duty by the RCMP.
-------------------
In 2000 I posted to our global group the only way to end the governments corrupt practices was to financially choke off what they value most, revenue. Hence no justice no investment and Program 2000, Sell Canada was coded.
Today a business channel formally admitted the whisper on the street is 'sell canada'.
I certainly appreciate the global support for a righteous cause, the children involved in government intentionally doubling the child poverty rate to increase revenue.
again thank you all
Robert
-----------------
October 18, 2014
I can think of no other reason the justice ministers blatantly ignore the law and two hunger strikes other than this lawlessness coincides with my taking up the cause of the children of divorce.
If you get anything out of all this get this. The government intentionally and having full knowledge of the results doubled child poverty in a decade even though 90% of child support is paid.
It's hard to ignore the stone cold facts even when the lawmakers say no one did anything wrong. Here are the facts.
If child support is eligible for government intervention the sole custody rate goes to 100%. That explodes the myth the courts are gender bias. The stone cold fact is the courts are tax bias, ignoring the best interests of the child in each and every case there is even a whiff child support will fatten government coffers.
I'm not sure what category a crime so heinous as to force hundreds of thousands of children to grow up in poverty fits into. It might not fit any Canadian law other than the Charter of Rights and the Humans Rights Act, guaranteed the right of association and the right to live the life they are capable of. That's reads not allowing the government to force children into poverty by collecting an unconstitutional tax. Our social safety nets are paid out of general revenue, burdening a select group, non custodial parents, to pay more than their constitutional share is obviously unconstitutional.
Given that government knows full well the laws that they wrote and quote as 'no one did anything wrong' are in fact ultra vires, the crimes qualify under international law as crimes against humanity.
I've made every effort to separate my situation from the cause but it's been a question on the minds of many and now needs clarification to avoid confusion.
The fact is you can support one without the other. I've been living on 8 to 12 thou a year disability pension so my situation has become hopeless as you can see by the following,,, but not for the children of divorce. They still need
no justice no investment
The RCMP have had 2 decades to uphold the law. The tens of billions investors have lost in Canadian equities is on their heads. The premise I've been working on is the tens of billions will demand the RCMP be disbanded, along with tort to recover losses caused by the dereliction of duty by the RCMP.
-------------------
In 2000 I posted to our global group the only way to end the governments corrupt practices was to financially choke off what they value most, revenue. Hence no justice no investment and Program 2000, Sell Canada was coded.
Today a business channel formally admitted the whisper on the street is 'sell canada'.
I certainly appreciate the global support for a righteous cause, the children involved in government intentionally doubling the child poverty rate to increase revenue.
again thank you all
Robert
-----------------
October 18, 2014
I can think of no other reason the justice ministers blatantly ignore the law and two hunger strikes other than this lawlessness coincides with my taking up the cause of the children of divorce.
If you get anything out of all this get this. The government intentionally and having full knowledge of the results doubled child poverty in a decade even though 90% of child support is paid.
It's hard to ignore the stone cold facts even when the lawmakers say no one did anything wrong. Here are the facts.
If child support is eligible for government intervention the sole custody rate goes to 100%. That explodes the myth the courts are gender bias. The stone cold fact is the courts are tax bias, ignoring the best interests of the child in each and every case there is even a whiff child support will fatten government coffers.
I'm not sure what category a crime so heinous as to force hundreds of thousands of children to grow up in poverty fits into. It might not fit any Canadian law other than the Charter of Rights and the Humans Rights Act, guaranteed the right of association and the right to live the life they are capable of. That's reads not allowing the government to force children into poverty by collecting an unconstitutional tax. Our social safety nets are paid out of general revenue, burdening a select group, non custodial parents, to pay more than their constitutional share is obviously unconstitutional.
Given that government knows full well the laws that they wrote and quote as 'no one did anything wrong' are in fact ultra vires, the crimes qualify under international law as crimes against humanity.
I've made every effort to separate my situation from the cause but it's been a question on the minds of many and now needs clarification to avoid confusion.
The fact is you can support one without the other. I've been living on 8 to 12 thou a year disability pension so my situation has become hopeless as you can see by the following,,, but not for the children of divorce. They still need
no justice no investment
