February 3, 2016
The RCMP have had 2 decades to uphold the law. The tens of billions investors have lost in Canadian equities is on their heads. The premise I've been working on is the tens of billions will demand the RCMP be disbanded, along with tort to recover losses caused by the dereliction of duty by the RCMP.
-------------------
In 2000 I posted to our global group the only way to end the governments corrupt practices was to financially choke off what they value most, revenue. Hence no justice no investment and Program 2000, Sell Canada was coded.
Today a business channel formally admitted the whisper on the street is 'sell canada'.
I certainly appreciate the global support for a righteous cause, the children involved in government intentionally doubling the child poverty rate to increase revenue.
again thank you all
Robert
-----------------
October 18, 2014
I can think of no other reason the justice ministers blatantly ignore the law and two hunger strikes other than this lawlessness coincides with my taking up the cause of the children of divorce.
If you get anything out of all this get this. The government intentionally and having full knowledge of the results doubled child poverty in a decade even though 90% of child support is paid.
It's hard to ignore the stone cold facts even when the lawmakers say no one did anything wrong. Here are the facts.
If child support is eligible for government intervention the sole custody rate goes to 100%. That explodes the myth the courts are gender bias. The stone cold fact is the courts are tax bias, ignoring the best interests of the child in each and every case there is even a whiff child support will fatten government coffers.
I'm not sure what category a crime so heinous as to force hundreds of thousands of children to grow up in poverty fits into. It might not fit any Canadian law other than the Charter of Rights and the Humans Rights Act, guaranteed the right of association and the right to live the life they are capable of. That's reads not allowing the government to force children into poverty by collecting an unconstitutional tax. Our social safety nets are paid out of general revenue, burdening a select group, non custodial parents, to pay more than their constitutional share is obviously unconstitutional.
Given that government knows full well the laws that they wrote and quote as 'no one did anything wrong' are in fact ultra vires, the crimes qualify under international law as crimes against humanity.
I've made every effort to separate my situation from the cause but it's been a question on the minds of many and now needs clarification to avoid confusion.
The fact is you can support one without the other. I've been living on 8 to 12 thou a year disability pension so my situation has become hopeless as you can see by the following,,, but not for the children of divorce. They still need
no justice no investment
The RCMP have had 2 decades to uphold the law. The tens of billions investors have lost in Canadian equities is on their heads. The premise I've been working on is the tens of billions will demand the RCMP be disbanded, along with tort to recover losses caused by the dereliction of duty by the RCMP.
-------------------
In 2000 I posted to our global group the only way to end the governments corrupt practices was to financially choke off what they value most, revenue. Hence no justice no investment and Program 2000, Sell Canada was coded.
Today a business channel formally admitted the whisper on the street is 'sell canada'.
I certainly appreciate the global support for a righteous cause, the children involved in government intentionally doubling the child poverty rate to increase revenue.
again thank you all
Robert
-----------------
October 18, 2014
I can think of no other reason the justice ministers blatantly ignore the law and two hunger strikes other than this lawlessness coincides with my taking up the cause of the children of divorce.
If you get anything out of all this get this. The government intentionally and having full knowledge of the results doubled child poverty in a decade even though 90% of child support is paid.
It's hard to ignore the stone cold facts even when the lawmakers say no one did anything wrong. Here are the facts.
If child support is eligible for government intervention the sole custody rate goes to 100%. That explodes the myth the courts are gender bias. The stone cold fact is the courts are tax bias, ignoring the best interests of the child in each and every case there is even a whiff child support will fatten government coffers.
I'm not sure what category a crime so heinous as to force hundreds of thousands of children to grow up in poverty fits into. It might not fit any Canadian law other than the Charter of Rights and the Humans Rights Act, guaranteed the right of association and the right to live the life they are capable of. That's reads not allowing the government to force children into poverty by collecting an unconstitutional tax. Our social safety nets are paid out of general revenue, burdening a select group, non custodial parents, to pay more than their constitutional share is obviously unconstitutional.
Given that government knows full well the laws that they wrote and quote as 'no one did anything wrong' are in fact ultra vires, the crimes qualify under international law as crimes against humanity.
I've made every effort to separate my situation from the cause but it's been a question on the minds of many and now needs clarification to avoid confusion.
The fact is you can support one without the other. I've been living on 8 to 12 thou a year disability pension so my situation has become hopeless as you can see by the following,,, but not for the children of divorce. They still need
no justice no investment
Market read
ReplyDelete10/16/2014 7:11 AM
In 2002 international investors started leaving Canada with the exodus complete by 2006 in everything but raw resources and currency speculation. Even with oil at $80 today's bounce in the tar sands companies proves old habits are hard to break, even when production cost is 80 to 100 a barrel.
It's a big gamble Saudi Arabia will cut production, I won't go into the long term details of the global market but today's price isn't everything so they won't till $70.
The hopium today is lower gas prices will bump up consumer spending and it will. Not near as much as hope for or required because 50% of consumer spending is done by the top 10% on the wealth indicator. Gas prices haven't been a factor in their spending habits, the other half of consumer spending that will benefit will consider debt reduction as their flight to safety.
After 5 years of stimulus fueling the 'bad news is good news', bull market, the market is buying into the fact more stimulus could light the fuse on the debt bomb so it's back to 'buy on the rumour sell on the news'.
The problem with the global economy is the colonial style economic system based on the even older 2000 year old Roman tax system.
It would be a good time to consider creating more jobs than workers.
If I could give a thumbs up to the comment above I'd give two.
ReplyDeleteOn September the 12th 2001 I started drafting an article on short sellers attacking the markets when they reopened. Do you homework was the main theme but I snuck in on how shorts would be crazy to bet against America. Even Lou Dobbs commented on air a couple of days after opening with, "we sure got those shorts".
In 2009 I stopped at Bills Beef Jerky Chilliwack and wrote on his calendar, Dow scraping bottom. It was March and it was the day the Dow bottomed out. I've had extensive training in how the market moves so people have patience.
The stigma of Maximus, MMS, of profiting from illegal activity of a corrupt government agency through a sub, FMEP, will bare fruit. Fraud, government corruption and theft in the major crime category. I've suggested to FMEP that their profit isn't worth MMS getting tainted with government corruption and like the Canadian government they already know the child support that fattens their coffers isn't worth the pariah label. Sooner or later they will get outed and someone will be walking through their doors with handcuffs.
The Canadian government is becoming an international pariah for two reasons. Their actions show they are doing more to promote climate change than mitigate because they want to exploit the Arctic.
The longer term issue is intentionally doubling the child poverty rate in a decade just to increase revenue.
The proof of pushing Arctic exploitation is in their actions, the reference (character reference) is the apprehensible exploitation of our most vulnerable children.
They are all going down but it's a big order, still well on track.
no justice, no investment
ReplyDeleteI had a word with Don Panik. Seems the markets are coming to grips with what they knew all along about the most hated bull market ever. Stimulus is not an economic plan, it's a tourniquet.
The Roman tax system has had many reconstruction surgeries to avoid the over taxation of the people that crushed the Roman empire, the wealthy didn't bail out the empire just like the 1% didn't bail out the banks. We've been in a pretty long run with due by on the notice. The occupy knows it as most of the people but they didn't offer much more of a plan than we have already. I noted awhile back governments are desperate for revenue and the demand is increasing more than tax increases satisfy. When it gets really tight the only taxable base will be the 1% and like the Roman Senators....
Sometime ago a few friendly kingdoms worried about the increasing unrest of the people putting the population in a bit of a killing mode so they invented war, let the people kill themselves instead of the elite and put the survivors to work rebuilding the losers.
The common theme of every war is the notion the world isn't big enough for everybody. Not a single war in history has made the world bigger. Selling that notion over the last few decades and now social media making up for the destruction of the family and kitchen table talk, it makes it very unlikely the destroy and rebuild has much of a chance of happening, that's not a plan.
Not sure if the Mayans had a similar tax system but the evidence shows the same symptoms of government crushing the population that supports them. The slaver nations of past fell to the same cheap labour we have today, production can't keep up to governments increasing demands. Gold went to paper and now earning have turned to debt, and the wealth has gone to the already wealthy. The bill has yet to be paid so that's not a plan.
Not to say we're not making some progress but how much of the population can you put into a lifetime of debt working for minimum wage. It's been 5 years since a few billion in bad mortgages turned into trillions in debt that didn't increase wages a cent. Not a plan.
Here at home the BC government is prosing a LNG tax regime that is lower than our energy giant neigbour Alberta, hoping to get by another election. The media that scavenges the carrion of political advertising failed to notice even at Alberta's higher tax rate they are still running a deficit, and our piddly little population of 4 million is already $65 billion in debt. I'm betting the people will notice. Not a plan.
With politicians in constant election mode no need to predict where those roads lead.
I don't often make hard predictions and the last was, the child poverty rate won't be solved until the handcuffs come out. Handcuffs are not a new theme as the only reason calling this child tax child support and forcing hundreds of thousands of children to grow up in poverty is not a criminal offence is because the law makers are the primary beneficiaries.
no justice no investment
https://www.facebook.com/DavidSuzuki
ReplyDeleteClean-Tech Oct 23 2014
The biggest polluter is transportation.
Electric cars and more public transportation are a step up.
Consider we have the technology to develop and build a global mag lev system for cars. The advantages of a short distance low pressure hydrogen car moved over long distances pollution free is a long list.
We don't give up our cars to save the planet
0 pollution
0 gridlock increasing personal productivity
1 track, tube, will handles 5 freeway lanes at speed
75% less pavement
replacing aging electrical grid
stable global revenue to fund mining resources off planet
no increase costs to broke consumers only a transfer, possibly less
and many more
Over the years I've considered everything from initial best global design to investment financing to sovereignty issues. We can do this but fighting over climate change or shutting down pipelines, even shutting down the entire tar sands won't do it.
We all know this so it's time to stop bitching and make serious proposals on saving the planet, and us.
Finally more green jobs than workers or other any jobs, the best way to stop a terrorist is with a job.
Add the UK to no justice no investment.
ReplyDeleteThe right company for the job. The question isn't the need it is how lawfully the job turns out.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/britain-award-benefits-contract-u-140023436.html
"Atos's decision to quit its five-year contract early came after the company said the system was not working. Its offices had attracted protests and its staff had been subjected to abuse over its decisions, a large proportion of which were overturned on appeal."
Another G-20 meeting that hasn't invented anything new since they were invented.
ReplyDeleteSpend more borrowed money to increase global GDP might get general consensus while Canada starting a new cold war isn't getting much attention. With Russia signing energy deals with China after taking over the potash supply to India, one can understand why Canada would be opposed to Russia having an ice free port in Crimea.
Baird made the call for Canada by saying the vote in Crimea was illegal and Russia contravened the Minsk Agreement. Even the sanctions are getting limited support, notwithstanding the bluster supplied by the UK and Australia because the Minsk Agreement specifically gives the people the right of self determination. The Ukraine government answered Crimea vote with artillery, which does contravene the Minsk non-aggression clauses, making even the sanctions illegal.
I wonder if any noticed the biggest shifts, or upheavals of societies, occur when the 1% gather up all the riches triggering a cascade effect of government attempting to salvage the system by standing on the shoulders of the 99%. Did they address the current state of economic affairs that the occupy movement brought forward years ago? I think not as increasing spending following the largest ever by far wealth transfer to the 1% is just digging the hole deeper.
The problem with stimulus isn't the spending its when the bill comes due which for Canada will be as Gen U takes over.
Alaska, the last place on earth to make Ice Wine, literally. With every new model on climate change increasing almost exponentially it will be the last climate cold enough.
ReplyDeleteJust tossing in a little lite reading.
Under previous calculations that included the lag between government accountability, a plan, and initiation followed by results we were at the tipping point of run away climate change. The months of increased production after the oil price decline confirmed the industry already knew. With something of a plan by picking a target out of thick air the new 30% reduction by 3030 extends the tipping point to 2022. Should a full plan with initiation not be in place by then it would be hard to believe any plan will reverse catastrophe climate change after that date.
Catastrophic climate change.
Nice pic but just to be sure we are on the same page. Run away climate change has no bounds. From a 200' increase in sea levels to changing the atmosphere into what Venus has today, hot enough to melt lead.
The G-7 just killed the planet.
ReplyDeleteBy putting off a carbon free world till the end of this century investment is getting yanked from renewable energy. Stocks are getting killed in every renewable category while oil goes ballistic.
Why invest in the future now when the future won't be here for 85 years and oil, LNG and Site C are here now.
-----------
The new oil wars.
The fight is no longer over possession its about market share. Russia wants access to the ice free port on the Crimea peninsula while Canada wants bitumen filling global demand. It is not about profit as production continued to increase throughout the decline in price. It is about getting as much product to market before the predicted Catastrophic Climate Change shuts down the fossil fuel industry.
With the G-7 showing no having no ambition to promote technological changes and renewable resources by putting off any political notice for most likely decades oil is up over $3/barrel while renewable are crashing but the new oil war goes on. Who will get the most product to market before CCC shuts it down and will we get in a shooting war with Russia over market share.
Minsk Agreement states in principle the people have the right to self determination while under no military threat. The people voted to stick with Russia and the Ukraine response was an artillery barrage. The Ukraine government broke the Minsk agreement by shelling its own people over the results of self determination, not Putin.
Its the new oil war Canada wants in on.
Just over an hour to go, oil up 2.3% but TSE down 80, Dow up 50
ReplyDeleteThe sell canada crowd is motivated
no justice, no investment
Perhaps I should check with the authorities to see if justice is going to be served by them or the global supporters of shared parenting, or are they even getting the message?
ReplyDeleteClick compare from this link, DOW S+P
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EGSPTSE+Interactive#{"range":"1mo","allowChartStacking":true}
Not everything goes up.
no justice, no investment