For international readers this blog contains info on the cause and effects of doubling the child poverty rate in a decade on investment risk.
To some the following could be considered slander, perhaps a few criminal slander. I have yet to receive even a warning of cease and desist because.
The truth is not slander.
Kangaroo courts, child abusers sitting on the bench of family court, legal aid lawyers pocketing child support, corrupt police force, manipulation of evidence by a judge, it's just your stereo-typical Canadian justice system and a corrupt tax desperate government.
Be aware and be wary.
Although the anecdotal is interlaced to give context the direction is strictly government corruption abusing the children of divorce. In a top G-8 economy with 90% child support paid, doubling a 1 in 10 child poverty rate to 1 in 5 in a decade is anything but anecdotal.The federal government has threatened to cut off my old age security as a means to silence truth. Essentially all my rent if I don't fill out past tax returns so FMEP can seize the returns through the ongoing fraud they, the government and the police are willing participants to.
I have informed Revenue Canada I refuse to fill out any more and that not even the federal government can force me to be a willing victim of a crime, I will not go down on my knees.
Someone needs to go to jail.
ReplyDeleteRobert Smith to: Royal Canadian Mounted Police
cc: jag.minister@gov.bc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca
bcc: PCC Complaints
date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:18 AM
To law enforcement and those in authority.
I have been threatened with losing my OAS if I don't fill out tax returns. Filling the tax returns results in expanding the current criminal acts being perpetrated. I refuse to be a willing victim of crime and I suggest Revenue Canada and the RCMP should stop be willing participants to a crime by empowering or failing to act.
I will not fill out any more until the criminal acts perpetrated are recognized and dealt with, regardless of the consequences.
Robert Smith
Chilliwack BC
Phone conversation with FMEP.
They said they were following the court order repeatedly. I repeatedly informed them they were lied to. The amount turned over was $48,000 not the $24,000 the payee reported and were involved in a fraud. If they didn't check on the amount then they are a willing participant. They again referred to the court order for arrears. I again informed them the amount was to indicate how much child support would come off my 50%.
I told the FMEP case worker I refuse to be a victim of this crime and will not file any more tax returns until this ongoing criminal act ceases. Therefore no old age security no rent food and I told them that and they will have to answer. They finally consented to check the amount but it won't be in time and I bet my life on that so. FMEP had unknown address in my file but I'm still at the same address they have on file I presume as a previous address, games.
May 12, 2015
FMEP, just answer the question...
FMEP filled a lien on our joint property. The proceeds of the sale was deposited in the court with my blessing any unpaid amounts due to cancer could be deducted.
After the 1999 ex parti that ordered all the funds be paid to the plaintiff FMEP released the lien. I assumed it was to make up missed payments that I volunteered to pay regardless of cancer. FMEP has one mandate, to collect child support. I've been asking for years, why did they release the property lien if what the plaintiff says is true, she only got half the money. If none was for child support where did the other half go?
Does the plaintiff and FMEP really expect any judge would order a legal aid lawyer be brought to full rate out of child support funds, with the blessing of FMEP?
emailed May 23, 2015
ReplyDeleteRoyal Canadian Mounted Police.
I remind you in 5 days I will again become a victim of crime. A crime you have full knowledge and a duty to uphold the law by preventing it, regardless of how it is reported.
I don't believe the stain of having the Hope detachment manufacture an alibi to avoid an active member exposed as a person of interest in a major theft will be helped by protecting others involved in this ongoing fraud.
The details.
FMEP says they have a court order to collect the arrears. The 1999 court order records how much the arrears are and that all the funds held by the courts be turned over to the plaintiff, Baker. Following that because it was ex parti I was ordered to pay court costs, bring her legal aid lawyer up to his full rate. The plaintiff says she only got her half the money even though the order says all. FMEP held a lien on our property to insure all child support was paid and they dropped the lien. I have repeatedly asked them why they dropped the lien if the child support was not received, they refuse to answer because they know it was paid or they would not have dropped the lien. They are fully aware they are participating in a fraud and they intend to continue victimising me in 5 days.
Robert Smith
Chilliwack BC
emailed May 13, 2015
As you do not accept reports of crime via email I am informing you of a crime about to be committed. This can be reported via email or even through crime stoppers and you are obligated to stop the crime from being committed.
In a recent telephone conversation FMEP assured me in a gleeful manner they would continue to be a willing participant.
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
The fraud continues.
ReplyDeleteNo response from FMEP why they released the lien if the child support was still owing or where the other half went if it didn't go to child support. The full amount of child support didn't just disappear into a legal aid lawyers pocket to bring him to full rate because no sane judge would order the child support funds be used for that purpose.
Because the system is part of the ongoing fraud the police have no stomach to take on any of their own.
I filed a complaint with the BC Law Society concerning the legal aid lawyer Thornton concealing the ongoing and significant child abuse. It went nowhere as only Thornton was invited to present the evidence against him. doh The fact is if you intentionally foment an assault on a child you are just as guilty.
Thornton, legal aid lawyer. May 8th I refiled that complaint as perjury and May 11th added another for fraud and theft. BC Law Society file # 20150351IN.
Madame Justice Baker. May 12. Manipulation of evidence benefiting the plaintiff while denying the defendant constitutional right to present evidence or legal council defined as a kangaroo court. BC LS 20150357IN.
Justice Grist. May 13. Child abuse. Allowing an assault in the court house and allowing the use of force to knowingly send the victim home with the abuser. BC LS 20150365IN
AG Anton. May 22. Failure to uphold the law and the responsibilities of the office. BC LS 20150361IN
note, they admit they do not investigate every complaint
========================
Formal complaint filled with police complaints commission, RCMP intentionally ignoring criminal activity that would illuminate concealing a member as a person of interest in a major theft.
from: Robert Smith to: Royal Canadian Mounted Police
cc: PCC Complaints
bcc: mcu@justice.gc.ca
date: Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:57 PM subject: Fwd: Details. Some has to go to jail. mailed-by: gmail.com
RCMP and Complaints.
It comes as no surprise you are ignoring a crime that benefits your employer after the Hope detachment created a fictitious story to keep a RCMP officer named as a person of interest in a major crime.
As the crime continues even though you have a duty to prevent crime by whatever means it is reported you have only shown through dereliction of duty the RCMP are as corrupt as the corruption it is protecting.
You cowards are only brave because you're packing guns.
I doubt if I will live to see the truth come out and when it does BC will have a private police force.
=========================
The feds didn't shut down my OAS as they threatened to do if I didn't get on my knees and continue to be a victim, but they are slow and I expect it might not happen until they verify I refuse to be a victim,,, lol, or not.
no justice, no investment
As predicted the BC Law Society has closed the file on Grist. Having an accused child abuser sitting on the bench of family court is not within their authority, or the government or the police.
ReplyDeleteLike the residential schools where 12% of the children died, the 50,000+ currently forced to grow up in poverty won't be able to hold politicians or judges to account after 50 years goes by before an inquiry into corruption.
BC Law Society uses Thorntons view as evidence to deny my children were assaulted on numerous occasions. RCMP continuing to ignore the assaults that would expose a member as a person of interest in a major theft. Like the first 2 the government is far too corrupt to care about law and order or justice and know they are unaccountable.
ReplyDeleteso i leave it up to you
no justice, no investment